When Hozier sat down and wrote the lyrics for ‘Take Me to Church’ his mind was whirling with thoughts that ranged from a recent break up all the way to a conflicted relationship with religion in his native Ireland. The song was written in the wee hours of the morning in his ‘studio’ that resided in the attic of his parent’s home. At the time, Hozier was a struggling musician hoping to generate some attention in the Dublin open mic scene.
Over time, Hozier tweaked the lyrics and worked on the presentation. Three months later he landed on a combination he liked which included just himself on vocals and all instrumentation other than drums. For that you can thank Fiachra Kinder.
The demo caught the attention of a local independent label called Rubyworks. This connection led to producer Rob Kirwan who combined Hozier’s powerful original vocals with live instrumentation
The irony of the video that accompanies today’s song is that the it comes with a parental advisory, yet people still flock to the ‘church’ every Sunday and expose their children to the heights of hypocrisy. Through the lyrics Hozier manages to convey his thoughts in the form of an intense five-minute metaphor, and he did so on the razor’s edge when he conjured up religious imagery to channel his frustration.
Growing up in Ireland, the church is always there – the hypocrisy, the political cowardice. The video has the same theme – an organization that undermines humanity.”
Hozier
Ultimately, it was the video that really laid his thoughts to bare. For this courage and conviction, you can credit Sinead O’Connor.
I don’t think I would feel licensed in my generation to write ‘Take Me to Church’ about the institutionalized Roman Catholic church and its legacy in Ireland if it weren’t for artists like Sinéad,”
Hozier
He went on to elaborate.
Coming from Ireland, obviously, there’s a bit of a cultural hangover from the influence of the church. You’ve got a lot of people walking around with a heavy weight in their hearts and a disappointment, and that shit carries from generation to generation. So, the song is just about that – it’s an assertion of self, reclaiming humanity back for something that is the most natural and worthwhile. Electing, in this case a female, to choose a love who is worth loving.”
Hozier
Through the video for ‘Take Me to Church’ that was shot on a budget of approximately $3000, Hozier was actually trying to bridge the culture of shame related to sexuality in Ireland and the stories that were coming out of Russia related to the repression and persecution of the LGBTQ community.
Sexuality, and sexual orientation regardless of orientation is just natural. An act of sex is one of the most human things. But an organization like the church, say, through its doctrine, would undermine humanity by successfully teaching shame about sexual orientation that it is sinful, or that it offends God. The song is about asserting yourself and reclaiming your humanity through an act of love.”
Hozier
Hozier and the production team effectively tell the tragic story of two men who were in an intimate and romantic relationship, but living in fear of discovery. To their horror, a lynch mob appears and one of the men is kidnapped, dragged into a forest and brutally beaten. The shocking presentation depicts a reality that exists for many even a decade after ‘Take Me to Church’ was initially released back in 2013. What’s more troubling is the groundswell of support that is brewing for those dubious factions who claim to speak to morality in present day politics. As always, when one lifts the veil, only ignorance and prejudice is exposed.
Once again, religion and hypocrisy walk hand in hand. In my eyes, these factions are never to be trusted.
According to Hozier, the line “I was born sick, but I love it. Command me to be well” was inspired by Elizabethan dramatist named Fulke Greville who wrote a poem in 1954 called ‘Chorus Sacerdotum’ which speaks of mankind being “created sick, commanded to be sound.”
These words accurately describe our conflicted relationship with religion and the evil factions that exploit the masses using such doctrines as a tool of morality and social control.
O wearisome condition of humanity!
Born under one law, to another bound;
Vainly begot and yet forbidden vanity;
Created sick, commanded to be sound.
What meaneth nature by these diverse laws?
Passion and reason, self-division cause.
Is it the mark or majesty of power
To make offenses that it may forgive?
Nature herself doth her own self deflower
To hate those errors, she herself doth give.
For how should man think that he may not do,
If nature did not fail and punish, too?
Tyrant to others, to herself unjust,
Only commands things difficult and hard,
Forbids us all things which it knows is lust,
Makes easy pains, unpossible reward.
If nature did not take delight in blood,
She would have made more easy ways to good.
We that are bound by vows and by promotion,
With pomp of holy sacrifice and rites,
To teach belief in good and still devotion,
To preach of heaven’s wonders and delights;
Yet when each of us in his own heart looks
He finds the God there, far unlike his books.
Fulke Greville
Rather than dwell on the philosophical nature of the lyrical presentation Hozier reduces the introduction to his love interest’s inappropriate affect.
Have you ever burst your shit laughing at Church? I think it’s something that all Irish people have experienced at some point. There’s a unique, wonderful aspect to an expression of irreverence in the face of what should be reverential.”
Hozier
It’s a real thing. The psychological term is actually called Pseudo Bulbar Affect which can be translated to emotional incontinence.
It is thought to be related to lesions in the cortex responsible for emotional control aspects, the bulbar nuclei, the physiological effector, and the hypothalamus which integrates the two. In this context, people can exhibit sudden and exaggerated expressions of emotion (laughter and crying) that may or may not be demonstrative of their mood at the time.”
Pseudo Bulbar Affect
Here is Hozier’s powerful lyrical presentation. ‘Take Me to Church’ can only be described as essential in every way. Hozier reveres his love interest and regrets the passing of their relationship enough to write this soaring poetry. Listen and feel it build.
My lover’s got humour
Hozier
She’s the giggle at a funeral
Knows everybody’s disapproval
I should’ve worshipped her sooner
If the heavens ever did speak
She’s the last true mouthpiece
Every Sunday’s getting more bleak
A fresh poison each week
“We were born sick,” you heard them say it
My church offers no absolutes
She tells me, “Worship in the bedroom”
The only heaven I’ll be sent to
Is when I’m alone with you
I was born sick
But I love it
Command me to be well
Aaay. Amen. Amen. Amen
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me that deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me that deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life
If I’m a pagan of the good times
My lover’s the sunlight
To keep the Goddess on my side
She demands a sacrifice
Drain the whole sea
Get something shiny
Something meaty for the main course
That’s a fine-looking high horse
What you got in the stable?
We’ve a lot of starving faithful
That looks tasty
That looks plenty
This is hungry work
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me my deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me my deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life
No Masters or Kings
When the Ritual begins
There is no sweeter innocence than our gentle sin
In the madness and soil of that sad earthly scene
Only then I am human
Only then I am clean
Ooh oh. Amen. Amen. Amen
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me that deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life
Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies
I’ll tell you my sins so you can sharpen your knife
Offer me that deathless death
Good God, let me give you my life”
If you get the sense that Hozier literally laid his soul to bare as he wrote this song you are correct.
I found the experience of falling in love or being in love was a death, a death of everything. You kind of watch yourself die in a wonderful way, and you experience for the briefest moment – if you see yourself for a moment through their eyes – everything you believed about yourself gone. In a death-and-rebirth sense.”
Hozier
This is among the many reasons that ‘Take Me to Church’ became a global hit. It went to #1 in five- countries, and #2 in eight others.
‘Take Me to Church also holds the distinction of being the highest charting song in Hot 100 history, slightly ahead of ‘Church of the Poison Mind’ by Culture Club.
Take a listen to Hozier as he delivers ‘Take Me to Church’ in an acoustic setting. It is fantastic, no matter how it is presented.
It is this broad appeal that led to ‘Take Me to Church’ becoming the most streamed track on Spotify in 2014; a mind boggling 87 million times
The accolades kept coming as ‘Take Me to Church’ received a Grammy nomination. While it did not win, the show did feature a duet with Annie Lennox, who reluctantly agreed to share the stage with Hozier in a medley that included ‘I Put a Spell on You’.
Lennox simply did not feel Hozier’s words were hers to share.
Due to its immense popularity, there are some interesting covers of ‘Take Me to Church’. Although a few are offered by some huge names in the recording industry, like Ed Sheeran, it is Ted Tocks opinion that the best come from the lesser-known names. Here are a handful of takes on ‘Take Me to Church’ beginning with Sheeran’s sped up delivery. Likely the weakest.
The first thing that struck me about Sofia Karlberg’s offering was the fact that she has over 62 million views. Then I listened and became captivated. She knocks this out of the park. Just a stunning cover.
Ted Tocks Covers has featured Demi Lovato in the past. She was part of a piece that profiled ‘Katy Perry’s ‘Roar’. This is really good, but it lacks the fiery explosion shared in Sofia’s cover. This is not a criticism. It is simply the truth.
Over the past couple of years, I have become a huge fan of Postmodern Jukebox. This cover features Morgan James on vocal and Scott Bradlee on piano. This is so expressive it almost brings you to tears. It presents like a one act play.
To conclude the musical portion of today’s feature, please enjoy Maren Morris and Hozier on stage in Nashville on CMT.
Knowing what I know about Tennessee I am only left with the concern that at least one third of the audience thinks ‘Take Me to Church’ has positive connotations in its reference to religious imagery. Regardless Hozier and Morris work well together and you can tell that this collaboration is borne out of a mutual respect.
When it all comes down to it, the underlying theme is the fact that way too often religion has been a destructive force in world history. Ultimately, as the collection plate is passed around, the comment on the report card could say that promises are made but rarely kept.
Wars have been fought and lives and generations have been destroyed, leaving communities in tatters. In the wake of it all, despite the fact all evidence points to religious factions being at the root of the conflict there has frequently been little or no retribution.
For just one example Ted Tocks Covers turns the camera toward Canada. Once known as the global bastion for social justice and equality. Sadly, the grim reality of this tale aligns directly with the Fathers of Confederation in 1867
What do we do about the Indian problem?
Enter the Canadian Indian residential school system which evolved out of the formation of the Indian Act in 1876. Truth be told, the premise of residential schools had been discussed long before confederation. In practice it would see a network of schools funded by the Canadian government’s department of Indian Affairs and (gasp) administered by Christian churches. The ultimate goal was to isolate Indigenous children from their traditions, culture and religion and assimilate them into colonial or Canadian culture. By 1894, under the leadership of Prime Minister Mackenzie Bowell attendance in these schools was made mandatory for all first nations children. Residential schools were purposely established hundreds of miles away from Indigenous communities. This was all in in an effort to minimize interaction between the children and their families. Canada’s dark secret was orchestrated by a century of governments in lock step with the trusted leaders of Canada’s religions community.
The harm that was done to Indigenous children borders on immeasurable. Generations of children were removed from their family environment and deprived of learning their traditional languages and experiencing their culture. The atrocities extended to malnutrition, starvation and rampant disease, and then escalated to physical and sexual abuse that have left families scarred for decades. This generational trauma has manifested itself in severe post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol and drug addiction and suicide.
By 2008, under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Canada established the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In mid-2015 the Commission concluded that what occurred during this dark period amounted to cultural genocide.
As a result of the Commission’s findings, Catholic entities were ordered to pay $25 million in restitution, but in reality, they only paid approximately $4.6 million before their debt was wiped clean
Around the time that the Harper Government relinquished control to Justin Trudeau’s Liberals, Canada agreed to “forever discharge” what was termed as Catholic entities from their agreement to raise the money for residential school survivors. Shockingly, for some reason the Catholic interests also had their legal debt forgiven.
To this day, the decision-making surrounding this remains somewhat of a mystery…
Ry Moran who is librarian at University of Victoria and founding director of the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation has been a vocal proponent for transparency, but for almost a decade no one has offered an explanation.
Like all questions around accountability, the question is, ‘Who made the decision? How was that decision made? Who ultimately signed off on this?’
Ry Moran
The initial agreement included a ruling that would have seen 48 Catholic entities pay a total of $79 million. The ruling was broken down into three sections and it seems to come down to some intricate terminology.
Essentially the phrasing created an opt out. It suggests that these Catholic entities make “best efforts” to raise $25 Million for residential school survivors. Ultimately Justice Neil Gabrielson ruled that the church covered all of their financial obligations and allowed them to walk away from the hollow promise of “trying their best” to raise funds for residential schools.
It seems in the world of Catholicism ‘best efforts’ lies somewhere in the area of 16.5%.
It was Stephen Harper’s Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, Bernard Harcourt that signed off on the agreement that freed the Catholic collective of their moral and financial obligations. This occurred during the 2015 federal election campaign.
Canada does hereby remise, release and forever discharge the Catholic entities, its directors, officers, shareholders, agents, lawyers, and employees, of and from all manners of actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, accounts, bonds whatsoever against the releasees.”
Government Document that absolved the Catholic Church of their responsibility
It went on to say…
Canada further covenants and agrees not directly or indirectly to join, assist, aid, or act in concert in any manner whatsoever with any person or entity in making any financial claim or demand whatsoever against the releasees.”
Government Document that absolved the Catholic Church of their responsibility
In the fall of 2021 Liberal Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller vowed to look deeper into the decision and find out how it came to pass. Many of the passages were redacted either in full or in part.
Ultimately, it is felt that the language that definitely originated with the Harper government is pretty much binding, so the Government of Canada will struggle to ever go back and seek any additional form of retribution. In other words, Stephen Harper’s legacy of hate in relation to Indigenous relations has yet another horrific chapter.
Keep in mind, all of this occurred before the unmarked graves of thousands of residential school children were discovered throughout western Canada in 2021.
It seems Harcourt and Harper literally signed a deal with the devil, but given Stephen Harper’s abject failure in every element of Indigenous relations this is no surprise. Somewhere this soulless cretin is likely summoning the ghost of Sir John A MacDonald in order to give him a high five.
Just one more reason why I will NEVER vote CONservative again.
Here is a CBC article that relates more detail related to this story.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-deal-catholic-church-fundraising-1.6557533
It’s a shame that as a country we can’t seize the Catholic Church’s assets one church at a time.
House the homeless. Feed the poor.
Solve the world’s problems. Tax churches everywhere.
The purpose of tying these atrocities into this feature on ‘Take Me to Church’ serves as another way to demonstrate that left to its own devices, religion is a divisive force and worse, it exists as a catalyst for evil and some of the worst of all atrocities. So much of the evil in today’s world can be traced to false idols presented from the pulpit in the name of (name your own) God.
Whether it be related to the repression or persecution of people based on their sexual orientation in Putin’s Russia or far-right RepubliCON areas of the United States, or examples of cultural genocide that have plagued humanity for centuries. Wherever the misallocation of religious doctrine and the manipulation of the masses by often corrupt leaders occurs, catastrophic results often follow.
So today, as we celebrate St. Patrick’s Day and attribute so much to the Christian missionary who is thought to have brought Christianity to Ireland a few things should be known about the pagan roots that are actually the foundation for the occasion.
St. Patrick’s Day is thought to be the adaptation of the pagan celebration of the Spring equinox. The festival was known as Ostara. One of the most important figures in paganism is Eostre, the goddess of spring and fertility. Note the similarity to Christianity and its celebration of Easter.
In the 5th century St. Patrick is thought to have converted the Irish people to Christianity using the shamrock which is a three-sided clover. The symbolism here is strong because of the connection to the Holy Trinity and its perceived protective powers, or good fortune. The colour green is also very strong in St. Patrick’s Day and it too has strong connections to pagan roots. Green represents Spring and rebirth. By extension; fertility.
To this day, people in Ireland still light fires on St. Patrick’s Day in order to welcome spring and ward off evil spirits. Bonfires would be accompanied by singing and dancing which was also thought to protect those who shared in the festivities.
All of this being said, it is most curious to note that St. Patrick’s Day is often celebrated more in North America than in Ireland itself.
It’s all just a way of taking you to church, and demonstrating that so much of what we know has a much deeper meaning, and so much of what we think we know has connections that can be traced back centuries to people who were more or less phased out because their thinking didn’t quite fit in with the incoming regime.
Once again, the madness and soil of that sad earthy scene rears its ugly head.
Take Me to Church?
No thanks!
There are better ways to learn, and history is best understood without the whitewashed obstruction of dubious religious entities.